OPEN ACCESS
Article

Refocusing the Undue Burden Test: Inconsistent Interpretations Pose a Substantial Obstacle to Constitutional Legislation

April 1, 2016
Edition: Spring 2016
Volume: 31
Issue: 1
Article: 1

Table of Contents

Abstract

Decades after Roe, debate over abortion remains as contentious as ever. States continue to pass regulations burdening the abortion right, but lack clear guidance on how to evaluate such regulations using the undue burden test. This Article chronicles Supreme Court jurisprudence on abortion and examines how the current circuit split surrounding FDA-protocol legislation fits within the larger framework. Finally, this Article applies the proper version of the undue burden test to FDA-protocol legislation, which resolves the circuit split and provides lower courts with a clear means of analyzing abortion issues moving forward.

Online Article Coming Soon.

Click here to download Article PDF

About the Authors

Affiliation: J.D., University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, 2016; I am very grateful to Professor Toni Massaro for her guidance throughout the writing process, as well as the Arizona Law Review editorial staff. I would also like to thank those who passionately demonstrate truth for inspiring me to tackle the topic of this Article.
Search